Egypt’s Generals turn to an Old Rival in the Fight against Islamist Militancy in Sinai

For over two years, the Islamist militant group Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (ABM) has been launching violent attacks against the Egyptian state in North Sinai. These fighters have been responsible for killing dozens of Egyptians in coordinated bombings, carrying out a handful of assassination attempts, and earlier this month demonstrated a possible change in tactics when suicide attackers blew up a bus killing three South Korean tourists and the Egyptian driver.

Despite regular claims to have killed or captured key militants, the Egyptian government’s attempts to quell the violence from this group have so far proven ineffective. There have been over 300 reported attacks since last July, and the run of attacks shows no sign of abating.

With insecurity in the Sinai peninsula deteriorating and Cairo looking short of options, it is little wonder that it has turned to others for help in tackling the Islamist militancy. However its latest choice of partner may raise some eyebrows.

When Cairo met Khartoum

At the start of February, according to Al-Sayyid Al-Badawi, head of the al-Wafd party, an Egyptian delegation returned from a visit to Sudan. There, the officials had agreed a deal with Khartoum over the deployment of joint military patrols along the Egyptian-Sudanese border.

Shortly after that meeting, another higher-level engagement was arranged with the Sudanese Defence Minister Abdel Rahim Mohamed Hussein who flew to Cairo for talks with Field Marshall Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, his counterpart/Egypt’s de facto ruler, and General Sedqi Sobhi, second-in-command of the Egyptian armed forces.

Such meetings are hardly typical of Cairo’s current relationship with Khartoum. Relations had been warm during the presidency of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohammed Morsi, with the country’s newfound friendship reaching its apogee in September 2012 when Morsi gave a speech to the United Nations expressing support for President Omar al-Bashir.

But Morsi was toppled in July in a military-led movement. And Egypt’s military establishment has never been particularly genial towards al-Bashir and has always maintained that the Sudanese president, who has been indicted by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity, should stand trial. Egypt’s relations with Sudan therefore cooled once more when Morsi was deposed. The new military-led government soon went about clamping down on the Brotherhood and eventually designated the group a terrorist organisation, leading many senior Brotherhood members to try to flee to Sudan.

Sisi’s campaign

In September, a couple of months after Morsi was deposed and Sisi became Egypt’s de facto ruler, the military announced that it was expanding its campaign in Sinai in response to ABM’s attemptedassassination of the Interior Minister Mohammed Ibrahim.

This fit in with Sisi’s general approach to Sinai since being appointed head of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) in August 2012. Sisi’s predecessor, Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, is known to have been against trying to control Sinai militarily, arguing instead for an informal arrangement whereby the state gave militant groups leeway in return for them confining themselves to specific areas and limiting activity. By contrast, Sisi since taking office has put his own stamp on the government’s policy in Sinai, favouring a much more aggressive approach.

“The Sinai campaign as it is today is very much Sisi’s campaign,” says Issandr el-Amrani, the Cairo-based North Africa Project Director for the International Crisis Group. “Sisi pushed in January 2013 for a more active campaign, where Egypt now takes advantage of its full military deployment quota in Sinai and goes directly after the militant groups.”

Unfortunately for Sisi, however, the results have thus far have not been impressive. Although accurate data is difficult to come by, the number of security forces personnel that have been killed may well be higher than the number of militants.

Indeed, in response to the September announcement that the military would step up its campaign in the region, ABM increased its violent activity. On 11 September, suicide bombers attacked the military intelligence building in Rafah and an armoured personnel carrier at any army checkpoint killing nine soldiers. Next, the group bombed the el-Tor Security Directorate, attacked the military intelligence facility in Ismailia, and in November claimed the assassination of intelligence officer Lieutenant Colonel Mohammed Mabrouk. By December militants had also killed 16 in an attack on a security directorate in Mansoura, bombed the Cairo security directorate in Abdeen, andassassinated senior Interior Ministry official Mohamed Said. On 25 January, the Islamist militants used a SA-18 surface-to-air missile to take down an army helicopter, killing five. And now it seems that it may have adopted a new tactic of also targeting tourists.

My enemy’s enemy

It is in the face of this inability to stem to violence that Cairo has called on Khartoum for help. Part of the problem with a military campaign against Sinai militancy is that the groups involved often don’t have traditional hierarchical command structures and are highly adept at concealing their plans and communications. ABM, for example, doesn’t have a clearly defined organisational structure, and intelligence is not even confident on basic facts about the group − estimates as to its size vary from 500 to 5,000 members. Meanwhile the insurgency is not confined to just one group − ABM appears to be the most active, but the likes of al-Salafiya al-Jihadiya, the Mujahideen Shura Council, al-Tawhid Wal Jihad, Ansar al Jihad, and the Egypt Free Army also operate in Sinai.

However, amidst all the uncertainty, one thing about the militants in Sinai is relatively well-accepted, which is that the militants get at least some of their arms from local Bedouin smuggling gangs. These groups are believed to run weapons from Sudan through routes running along the Red Sea, before passing through the Suez towns or across the Gulf of Suez in small boats. Egyptian intelligence has been particularly concerned by this flow of weapons since the downing of one of its helicopter with a surface-to-air missile.

Military or military border guards are meant to control the roads along these routes, but shipments still appear to be slipping through. One explanation is that the smugglers are highly skilled at avoiding main roads and border guards; another is that the security forces − those supplied by the state as well as by private oil and gas companies in the region − are drawn from local Bedouin communities and have ties with the smugglers.

These gangs are also known to engage in the trafficking of humans, particularly of Eritrean refugees who they torture and hold for ransom. But so far, pressure from international human rights organisations on Egypt and Sudan to coordinate and crackdown on traffickers has largely been unsuccessful, partly perhaps because of the two country’s ongoing disagreements over issues such as the Renaissance Dam project and the Hala’ib Triangle border.

However, with insecurity in Sinai growing, this reluctance to combine forces now seems to be waning. Whether increased co-operation in tackling arms smugglers will lead to closer diplomatic ties between Egypt and Sudan remains to be seen, but with attack after attack undermining Sisi’s control of the Egyptian state, he is hoping he can find a friend in an old rival.

This article was originally published with Think Africa Press on February 26th 2014.

Tunisia’s NSA-style intelligence drive

A few weeks ago, in a coastal suburb of Tunis known as Raoued, the government of Tunisia set the stage for creating an NSA-style spy agency to monitor telecommunications and Internet activity, including by its own citizens.

That day, the nation’s counterterrorism police fanned out through the normally quiet residential area as special forces armed with automatic weapons surrounded a large house, inside of which heavily armed militants were believed to be hiding. Onlookers were cordoned off at a distance.

The operation unfolded slowly over the course of 24 hours. When police finally issued orders by loudspeaker for those inside the building to give themselves up, there was silence. Then suddenly a firefight broke out, and by the time it was over, seven militants and one national guardsman were dead.

The government would later proclaim the successful raid a victory for the people, made possible by its increasing ability to monitor terrorist groups and prevent attacks before they happen. Underlying those claims was a subtext that has often been cited by American intelligence agencies and the Obama administration in recent years: that monitoring the activities of private citizens is essential to counterrorism efforts.

In Tunisia, the birthplace of the Arab Spring, that approach has a particular resonance, because the protests in 2011 were in part sparked by the authoritarian government’s spying on its own citizens. As Tunisia prepares to create an agency known as the Technical Agency for Telecommunications (abbreviated ATT), some are concerned that the country is headed back in the direction of where the trouble began.

Jillian York, director of the San Francisco-based International Freedom of Expression at the Electronic Freedom Foundation, noted that the ATT “is entirely inspired by the NSA, and in much the same way, there’s the justification for spying on a state’s own citizens using legitimate security concerns.”

Others inside Tunisia are more critical. Tunisian lawyer Kais Berrjab accused the government of “voyeurism” and claims the establishment of the ATT represents a “battery of legal irregularities related to unconstitutionality and illegality.” Berrjab added that what little official documentation exists regarding the ATT is obfuscated and fails to properly define the organization’s relationship with judicial authorities, and that there is no legal framework for providing civilian accountability over the agency’s actions.

The day after the attack on the house in Raoued, on Feb. 3, 2014, Tunisia’s minister of the interior, Lotfi Ben Jeddou, released a photograph of one of the slain men wearing a belt laden with explosives. The man was Kamel Gadhgadhi, a senior member of the militant organization Ansar al-Sharia Tunisia.

Gadhgadhi had been wanted for some time, and his death was considered more significant evan than the much-publicized government crackdown on Ansar al-Sharia. Gadhgadhi was the main suspect in the assassination of popular left-wing politician Chokri Belaid last year, an event that plunged the country into new political turmoil, from which it has only recently recovered.

Belaid had been an outspoken critic of Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali’s dictatorial Tunisian regime and the Islamist Ennahda movement then leading the country’s ruling coalition. Though partisan, Belaid was respected across the political spectrum, so when suspicions surrounding his assassination fell on Ansar al-Sharia Tunisia, the government’s reputation suffered. Belaid’s assassination was seen by many as evidence that the Ennahda government was incapable of providing security for its own citizens, while others suspected that it was secretly encouraging extremists like Ansar al-Sharia.

The killing sparked a general strike and protests in which as many as a million people, or around 10 percent of the population of Tunisia, took to the streets. Demonstrators flooded the central thoroughfares and economic heart of the city, Avenue de France and Avenue Habib Bourguiba. The anger was palpable. Business and day-to-day life ground to a halt. The following month, then-Prime Minister Hamadi Jebali was forced to resign.

Six months later, a second secular opposition figure, Mohamed Brahmi, was assassinated under strikingly similar circumstances. Tunisians again took to the streets, and this time anger with the government reached a higher pitch. Popular pressure then set in motion a chain of events that led to the dissolution of the entire cabinet and the appointment of a new, technocratic prime minister from outside Ennahda. So when the Interior Ministry announced that it had killed Gadhgadhi – the man accused of pulling the trigger that started it all – they wasted no time in declaring the operation a victory for the people.

“Gadhgadhi is the one who carried out the political assassination of Chokri Belaid… this is a gift to the families of the martyrs,” Interior Minister Ben Jeddou said in a national press conference.

“Inspired by the NSA”

With the anniversary of Chokri Belaid’s murder marked by Gadhgadhi’s death, and the country having recently passed a new constitution widely praised for achieving consensus between secular and Islamist camps, Tunisia’s new prime minister, Medhi Jomaa, is in an enviable position among North African leaders.

Neighboring Libya is gripped by militia violence, and Egypt’s political system and economy are in shambles, yet Tunisia’s reputation in diplomatic and international business circles remains good despite recent setbacks. U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon went so far as to describe Tunisia as “a model to other peoples seeking reform.”

Beneath this hopeful veneer, the relationship between Tunisia’s government and its people is uneasy, and unstable. And the fight against extremism remains a sore spot. Some Tunisians (including the widows of Belaid and Brahmi) pushed the government to account for how they had discovered his whereabouts, and though the government has offered few details, it has acknowledged that a captured member of Ansar al-Sharia, Mahjoub Ferchichi, gave up the location of the militants’ house.

Intelligence of the kind that led to security forces tracking down Gadhgadhi had previously been gathered by two separate organizations based in the Interior Ministry’s imposing building: the General Directorate for Specialized Services, and the General Directorate for Technical Services.

Now, Tunisian authorities are creating a new, more professional spying service and establishing a single centralized intelligence agency that will include the kinds of mass-monitoring of telecommunications and Internet traffic that made the NSA so controversial in the U.S.

Rights advocates and observers fear that in the government’s desire to ameliorate popular dissatisfaction and secure the state against extremists like Gadhgadhi, it will return to the authoritarianism of the past. York pointed out that the head of the ATT will be directly appointed by the government’s Ministry of Information and Communication, making it difficult to argue that the agency is independent of the central state.

The group Reporters Without Borders has also heavily criticized what some call “Tunisia’s NSA,” arguing that it revives unwelcome memories of Ben Ali’s security state. “This violates the principles that should govern Internet surveillance mechanisms, above all control by an independent judicial authority and the principles of need, relevance and proportionality of surveillance measures, as well as transparency and monitoring by the public,” the organization said in a release, which also noted that the government plans to exempt the ATT from legal obligations of transparency that are required of other agencies, and that doing so “endangers respect for fundamental freedoms.”

Part of the impetus for the new surveillance program is to prove to Western allies that Tunisia can monitor terrorist communications on its own, according to Monica Marks, an Oxford University researcher based in Tunis. “The government was embarrassed by the fact that the CIA managed to get information on Brahmi’s assassination before they did, after the Americans had sent a notice to Tunisia’s interior ministry letting them know Brahmi was potentially in danger,” Marks said. “The Tunisian government wants to plug security gaps by building a new intelligence facility with well-trained employees and more-sophisticated technology.”

Doing so will not only reassure allies; it will help galvanize Tunisia’s position in the eyes of a wary international business investors that the country will continue to be more stable than its neighbors.

International Pressure

Signs that Tunisia is expanding intelligence operations, including the operation against Gadhgadhi and a subsequent raid in the suburb of Borj Louzir that resulted in the capture of Ahmed Malki (a suspect in the Brahmi case), are most welcomed by international observers in counterterrorism. A Western diplomat in Tunis told IBTimes that during the past few months European countries have been pushing their contacts in the Tunisian government to accelerate plans for an upgrade to its intelligence services. The International Crisis Group has also advised the Tunisian government to improve counterterrorism operations and crack down on smuggling. And when U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry made a surprise visit to Tunis to meet with Tunisia’s new prime minister, Medhi Jomaa, on Feb. 18, he publicly pledged American support for the country’s security program.

“No democracy can survive or prosper without security,” Kerry said in a speech at the U.S. embassy in which he praised the “very significant arrests that were made and the breakup of Ansar al-Sharia’s cells in the last weeks.”

Immediately following the visit, the U.S. agreed to provide Tunisian police with a mobile command and control vehicle and a forensic laboratory.

The West is not alone in its encouragement. Tunisian authorities are shoring up relations with neighboring states that have long since mastered the art of internal surveillance. Earlier this month, Jomaa visited Algeria for two days of meetings with high level officials there. Algeria’s shadowy security apparatus is known to be accomplished in both counterinsurgency operations and communications surveillance, and after the visit, the two countries agreed to set up three military surveillance systems along their joint border.

And, for better or worse, Tunisia has no shortage of people with experience in operating mass communications surveillance technology. Under Ben Ali, the country was a regional pioneer of state surveillance and a testing ground for surveillance products of U.S. origin, such as SmartFilter, technology created by McAfee that has been used in Tunisia since 2002 to block access to parts of the Internet.

Opacity at all levels

“Especially since the Snowden scandal, the commitment of Tunisians regarding net-freedom and privacy is strong,” said Moez Chakchouk, chair and CEO of the Tunisian Internet Agency (ATI), which was previously in charge of national cyberspace investigation but has since been superseded by the ATT. Chakchouk was responsible for reforming the Tunisian state’s Internet policies after the 2011 revolution, when transparency was the major goal. He is known for bringing bloggers and activists together in a cooperative drive to end the era of the state as Internet censor and monitor.

But since the establishment of the ATT, the role of Chakchouk’s organization has changed. He has been sidelined, and whatever progress his reformist agenda achieved will have little bearing on the actions of the ATT. He also has grave doubts about the future of Tunisian citizens’ freedoms.

“The benefits, if they exist, are about the fact that for the first time surveillance has a form, an agency, and we are no longer in the era of Ben Ali where monitoring was done without anyone knowing who practiced it,” Chakchouk told IBTimes.

Though Tunisia’s former information minister, Mongi Marzouk, claims the ATT was inspired by the model of countries such as Peru and Sweden, Chakchouk says he has his doubts. “There is a risk to users’ data protection, transparency, and in the composition of the ATT’s board — it isn’t nonpartisan,” he says.

Berrjab said he also has concerns about “the opacity of the agency at all levels, the lack of audit mechanism or neutrality, and impartial technical control over the work of the ATT, and the fact that its officers are not sworn,” which he said means citizens have no assurances that their rights and freedoms will be respected.

Representatives of the Tunisian government did not respond to requests for comment on the role of the ATT, but fears persist that it could be overzealous in its effort to track down militants like Gadhgadhi, and to allay Tunisians’ desires for security.

As York put it, “Starting with legitimate concerns about security, the state can then push beyond that and you see surveillance used against political dissidents or just in violation of basic privacy. This isn’t a total regression for Tunisia back to the days of dictatorship, but it is certainly very concerning.”

This article was originally published with the International Business Times on February 26th 2014.

Egypt’s government on collision course with labour

Egypt’s military government heads for collision with organised labour as doctors hold their fourth strike of the year, and pressure builds in the country’s textile industry.

Medical professionals in Egypt are planning an unprecedented series of strikes this month to demand authorities answer their calls for increases in spending on healthcare and a raise to the minimum wage for doctors, according to an announcement by Khairy Abdel-Dayem, head of the Doctors’ Syndicate.

On Wednesday the union held what was already its fourth strike of 2014, and second in February, when professionals across the country – excluding those working in emergency service roles – held protests at syndicate headquarters.

Doctors and nurses are claiming that the government has ignored their repeated complaints about poor working conditions, structural problems in the Egyptian healthcare service, and low pay.

The Doctors’ Syndicate saw a radical restructuring in December when an independent movement within the union won 11 of the 12 board seats, beating out Muslim Brotherhood candidates who had previously been dominant. The syndicate also elected its first female secretary-general, Mona Mina, a veteran labour campaigner and founding member of the activist group Doctors Without Rights.

But in a development this weekend Dr Mina announced that she was resigning from her post in the syndicate. “Doctors are suffering from a horrible deterioration in their status and they are hugely divided,” she said, adding that internal divisions had made her position impossible.

Dr Mina was involved in organising sit-ins and protests against the regime of the ousted president Hosni Mubarak, and helped found a group called Tahrir Doctors during the January 25 2011 uprising which provided medical assistance to demonstrators injured in the protests. Tahrir Doctors went on to support those injured in subsequent protests against the rule of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces under Field Marshal Mohammed Tantawi, and against Mohamed Morsi’s Islamist government.

In an announcement to press in January, Dr Mina claimed the government’s attitude to healthcare, and budgetary commitments to its improvement were unacceptable. “Egypt’s health expenditure is below that of poor countries, not just that of developed economies,” she said.

According to World Bank data Egypt’s healthcare spending is equivalent to around 4.9 percent of GDP, lower than the 8.4 percent of Sudan, 6.2 percent of Tunisia, or 6 percent of Morocco, but higher than in Algeria or Libya, which spend just 3.9 and 4.4 percent of GDP respectively.

Under Dr Mina, the syndicate was locked in disputes with the Ministry of Health and its head Dr Maha el-Rabat. Dr Rabat’s reputation among labour campaigners has never been good due to her involvement in a series of hospital privatisations (in collaboration with USAID) during the Mubarak regime.

The Health Ministry claims the government is taking the strikes seriously. On Thursday interim president Adly Mansour announced a decree that offered doctors bonus pay, although did not increase the base salary. The government also offered to marginally raise hazardous pay.

“We take the strikes very seriously and respect the constitutional right to strike, but we believe this bill is a step in the right direction for the negotiations given what the budget can currently withstand,” Dr Ahmed Kamel, an official in the Health Ministry, tells This is Africa.

The union has said it will continue to strike twice a week until its next major meeting on February 21.

On Saturday hundreds of junior ranked police officers also went on strike in seven different governorates to protest against bad pay and poor working conditions. Leaders claimed they would expand their demands to include the resignation of the Interior Minister, Mohamed Ibrahim, if their complaints are not addressed.

A legacy of revolution

Egypt’s professional classes have played an important role in recent uprisings. “The professional syndicates played a key role in the removal of Mubarak in early 2011, and remain a potent force within Egyptian politics,” says Citigroup’s chief economist for the Middle East, Farouk Soussa.

Mr Soussa believes that the greater political engagement of the middle classes resulting from the uprising against former-president Mubarak will now be a long-term trend.

“So far, professional unions have restricted their activities to the pursuit of the interests of their members, but their actions are still disruptive to economic activity, and reflect a legacy of the 2011 revolution that is unlikely to recede anytime soon,” he says.

The revolutionary April 6 movement, which was central in organising against Mr Mubarak during the 2011 uprising, originally arose from strikes in Egypt’s textile producing region, Mahalla, in 2008. The leadership of the April 6 movement has been imprisoned since the July military coup.

Over the past few months press in the textile industry has been building again. In July, more than 20,000 workers in the Mahalla state spinning and weaving company went on strike, claiming to have received just half of the bonuses previously promised to them by the state.

Plant managers attempted to placate the strike by promising to make up the difference the following month, but payments didn’t come through, and in August tens of thousands of workers again went on strike to demand the promised funds, reportedly equivalent to over a month’s salary.

Disputes have continued and in October Mahalla workers staged a major strike, this time storming the office of the company’s CEO, Fouad Abdel-Alim. For three days the plant was shut down by the sit-ins until the company agreed to pay another tranche of missing payments.

Bread, freedom, and social justice

Officials are aware that many of their planned policies put them in conflict with the interests of Egypt’s lower-paid workers, who are demanding social reform, and they have made some attempts to mitigate popular dissatisfaction.

In December of last year the government announced plans to introduce a minimum wage for public sector workers of 1,200 Egyptians pounds or just over $170 per month. The increase would have a practical effect, given roughly a quarter of the country’s population currently live below the poverty line, but only applies to around five million workers. The cost of the plans has been estimated at $2.6bn per year.

Average salaries are in fact higher in the public sector than the private, where no minimum wage regulations are planned. The overwhelming majority of spending outlined in two separate $4.3bn fiscal stimulus packages has still been targeted at the business community and not workers.

A World Bank official in Cairo tells This is Africa that it has launched a $200m intensive labour

programme in Egypt aimed at getting unemployed, unskilled workers into short-term employment in public works projects. The programme gives unemployed labourers jobs cleaning canals, repairing houses and roads, and working in community service roles.

“The current strike reflects the deeper structural challenges that the Egyptian state has been facing for over two decades: an inability to meet its responsibility to protect the social and economic rights of a variety of important social groups that the state had traditionally protected,” according to Hesham Sallam, a fellow at the Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law at Stanford University.

Mr Sallam argues that this trend is a reminder that the structural problems and widespread societal grievances that contributed to Mr Mubarak’s downfall are still prevalent.

“That three years have passed since Mubarak’s downfall and demands for more humane wages and working conditions have persisted reflects the harsh reality that the quest for ‘bread, freedom, and social justice’ is still ongoing,” he says.

This article was originally published with Financial Times: This is Africa on February 10th 2014.

UK government faces questions over arms exports to North Africa

The British government has approved licenses worth at least £800m for the sale of military equipment and dual-use goods to countries across North Africa, , drawing criticism from rights groups and select committees.

In the past five years the British government has approved 1,258 licenses for the sale of military and dual-use military/civilian goods worth £833m to North African countries with extensive records of internal repression, a This is Africa investigation reveals.

The items licensed for sale include tear gas, explosives, military class helicopters, sniper rifles, surface to surface missiles, and small arms such as shotguns and assault rifles.

According to data obtained through Freedom of Information requests and the Campaign against the Arms Trade (CAAT) database, sales to North Africa have weathered the aftermath of the Arab revolts that touched every country in the region, and saw Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, and Tunisia’s Zine El Abidine Ben Ali deposed.

Over a quarter of the licenses granted in the last five years, which have a known value of around £140m, are active to this day.

The two biggest North Africa markets for British arms exporters over the period, Libya and Algeria, are also currently included in the UK Trade and Investment Defence and Security Organisation’s list of “priority markets for UK arms exports”, despite Libya being listed by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office as a “country of human rights concern”.

Egypt: Leading importer of British arms

The most evident trend in arms sales to the region over the 2008-13 period is the rising prominence of Egypt as an export market, the data show

Despite being listed as a “country of concern” by the Foreign Office, Egypt now represents over 40 percent of the value of active licenses for British military and dual use goods sold to North Africa, making it the biggest current market for UK arms in the region.

According to Foreign Office data, 62 percent, or £77m of the £124m of controlled exports to Egypt, were purely for military goods with no dual civilian use. One of the largest arms deals to Egypt took place in March 2013, when the government approved a £43.5m license for components for military helicopters, This is Africa has found.

Egypt underwent a military coup in July last year, a development which subsequently led to the temporary suspension of 47 of the 134 active export licenses to the country in August after severe security crackdowns on supporters of the deposed former president, Mohamed Morsi.

Security forces raided protest camps at Rabaa al-Adawiya mosque on August 14 2013, killing hundreds in acts described by Human Rights Watch as “the most serious incident of mass unlawful killings in modern Egyptian history”.

Export licenses were suspended pending investigation in cases where the goods they included “could be used for internal repression”. Their status was then reviewed, leading to seven being permanently revoked, and a further 16 placed on indefinite suspension. Twenty four were restored.

“Suspension will be kept under review until such time as conditions in Egypt indicate that it is appropriate to lift these restrictions,” the Government said in a response to UK Foreign Affairs Committee questioning on arms exports to Egypt.

“The suspended licences cover a wide range of equipment including spares for helicopters and aircraft, specialist software and communications equipment,” according to a public statement by the Export Control Organisation, which issues licences for the export of strategic goods.

Libya: The Qadhafi legacy

While Egypt is currently the leading importer of British arms in North Africa, Libya was the region’s largest overall recipient of UK military and dual-use goods, with £329m of controlled goods exported there from the UK between 2008 and 2013.

British corporate interests in Libya improved after diplomatic ties were reopened by a meeting between the Muammar Qadhafi and former British prime minister Tony Blair in 2004.

The majority of the goods were dual military and civilian use, but licenses were issued for military helmets, anti-riot shields, assault rifles, hand grenades, and combat shotguns.

An unknown British company also attempted to gain a license on August 11th 2010 for a £22m deal to export “spacecraft” to Libya.

This is Africa has been unable to discover exactly what goods were being exported or if the deal was successfully completed, however defence analyst and Middle East and North Africa editor at Jane’s Defence Weekly, Jeremy Binnie says, “there are Wikileaks cables that say Gaddafi was interested in buying a US satellite capable of tracking desertification in Libya.”

“A British company may have been attempting to obtain a contract related to that satellite programme,” Mr Binnie says.

In September of last year an Early Day Motion was raised in parliament over British arms exports to Libya by Green Party MP Caroline Lucas and signed by members of all parties.

The motion noted “an inherent conflict between strongly promoting arms exports to authoritarian regimes whilst strongly criticising their lack of human rights at the same time.”

Algeria: Falling sales in priority market

The single largest deal licensed by Export Control in North Africa took place in 2010, when the sale of military helicopters with a value of £260m was approved to Algeria. The Algerian state uses military helicopters in its border security programmes and in campaigns against Sahel militant groups such as Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQMI).

Algeria was the second highest recipient of UK arms during the period for which data are available (largely as a result of the single helicopter deal) but sales have fallen dramatically, and it now represents just 6 percent of the value of active British licenses to the region.

As the country with the largest defence budget in Africa, estimated to be over $10bn (approximately 3.8 percent of GDP), Algeria is now listed as a priority market for British military exports by the UK Trade & Investment Defence & Security Organisation.

A total of 96 percent of controlled exports to Algeria were for military equipment, including weapon sights, aerial targeting equipment, and components for guided missiles.

Morocco: Arms in Western Sahara

In neighbouring Morocco, which was the subject of just under 20 percent of export licenses to the region, the majority of them military only, the largest single deal was a 2011 contract for technical equipment supporting the Moroccan drone programme.

Morocco is known to operate an unarmed version of the predator drone, a BAE systems “Skyeye” drone, and Moroccan forces have received training from the US military’s Africa Command in the operation of the smaller RQ-11B Raven drone.

British arms exports to Morocco have also involved the sale of armoured vehicles, sniper rifles, mortar bombs, tear gas, rocket launchers and surface to surface missiles. The majority of Morocco’s armed forces are deployed in the occupied territory of Western Sahara, where more than 100,000 troops are stationed but the population numbers just 500,000. International partners neither recognise Morocco’s legitimate authority over Western Sahara nor the state’s sovereignty.

Sudan and Tunisia: Smaller markets

Sudan is likely the smallest market for British arms in the region, as although controlled exports totalled a value slightly higher to Sudan than Tunisia, overwhelmingly exports to Sudan were for dual-use military and civilian goods.

Nonetheless, British companies have sold body armour, military helmets, weapon sight mounts, and military explosive devices to Sudan, which features alongside Libya as a Foreign Office- designated country of human rights concern.

Sudan is alleged to be out an air-war against its own population in Blue Nile State, South Kordofan, and Darfur, which according to the Enough Project’s Akshaya Kumar are “indiscriminate towards civilians” and constitute “war crimes”. The country’s leader Omar al-Bashir is charged with war crimes by the International Criminal Court.

Tunisia is the subject of just under 10 percent of licenses granted for restricted military or dual-use goods to North Africa over the last five years, and 15 percent of the active export licenses. Sales to Tunisia total around £20m and include cryptographic software, ammunition for small arms, military support vehicles, and anti-armour ammunition.

Human rights concerns

The British Government has faced written questions from the Foreign Affairs Select Committee on its policy of allowing military equipment to be sold to regimes with histories of human rights abuses. In its response to concerns raised about the scale of arms sales to repressive regimes, the government said it “has confidence in the UK’s thorough and robust export licensing system to distinguish between exports for legitimate defence and security purposes, and exports which pose unacceptable risks to human rights.”

According to the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT), only 14 percent of the British public believe that the UK is justified in selling military equipment to governments that have a poor human rights record.

“It is deeply concerning that the UK government is still exporting so many weapons to countries with such grave and serious human rights concerns,” Andrew Smith, a spokesperson for CAAT tells This is Africa.

“The Arab Spring should have seen a re-appraisal of how we do business with these countries. All military exports send a message of support to the recipient regime and undermine calls to respect human rights.”


This article was originally published with Financial Times: This is Africa on January 14th 2014.

Comment: The EU is supporting a brutal military occupation in Western Sahara

For 38 years the occupation of Western Sahara by Morocco has been largely ignored by the rest of the world. The reasons for this aren’t profound. It’s sparsely populated, difficult to get to, and not particularly strategically important. It is also one of the greatest moral failures in the international community’s modern history.

In 1975, in violation of a World Court judgement, Morocco invaded the former Spanish colony and effectively annexed it. The people who lived in the territory, the Sahrawi, fled in their thousands as their villages were burned and livestock slaughtered.

Tens of thousands were driven into refugee camps across the border with Algeria where they remain to this day, surviving as best they can on pitiful levels of humanitarian aid. Those who stayed in their homes face severe repression in a police state which maintains an armed force over 100,000 strong for a population of just 500,000.

The story of Western Sahara is one riddled with injustice and cruelty, but its latest chapter is particularly shameful. On Tuesday, International Human Rights Day, the European Parliament voted to approve an agreement that not only provides moral cover for the Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara, it provides material support for it.

The EU agreement grants access to Moroccan waters for European fishing companies, the majority of them Spanish, in return for payments of around $55m. It also provides access, in direct contravention of a UN legal counsel statement from 2002, to Western Sahara’s waters.

The Sahrawi have not been consulted about this and do not consent to it. Both representatives in the refugee camps and activists in the occupied territory have publicly denounced the EU agreement, which they claim is an attack on their right to self-determination, and acts to support the occupation.

It isn’t possible to counter this argument, because it happens to be correct, so Morocco has resorted instead to more force. In Western Sahara’s capital Laayoune, protests against the agreement – again, held on International Human Rights Day – were met with a brutal police and army response which has been caught on video.

This is typical. Any Sahrawi who dare to speak out at all in the territory, let alone about lucrative international contracts, are subjected to a vicious campaign of repression by Moroccan security forces.

When I was last in the occupied territory (undercover, as access is very restricted) a young woman, no older then 30, showed me a set of prosthetic teeth she now wears as a result of what happened  on last year’s International Human Rights Day. Her name was Salimah, and she had been beaten so badly by Moroccan security forces that all six of her lower front teeth were smashed in.

It was in Western Sahara in October 2010 that the Arab Spring revolts began, and where they were most effectively crushed by state power. European leaders have repeatedly claimed to support  democratic Arab Spring movements and the spirit of freedom and justice they were built on.

Should the EU proceed in supporting the Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara in this manner, it will be difficult to conclude that European rhetoric about democracy, freedom, and human rights amounts to anything other than neat hypocrisy.


This article was originally published with The Independent on December 13th 2013.

Caught on camera: Sudan’s war on its own population


Fires rage and craters litter the Sudanese town of Abu Zabad after a Sudanese Armed Forces raid aimed at “eradicating” rebel groups in West Kordofan state.

The raid, which included extensive aerial bombardment of the town, appears to have taken place in response to the rebel seizure of Abu Zabad on November 17, and has been captured by satellite images.

Analysis of the open-source satellite intelligence reveals evidence of government troop movements consistent with an expanding offensive against rebel groups such as the Justice and Equality Movement and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North.

Images show Sudanese Armed Forces and military equipment – including hundreds of armoured trucks and Heavy-Lift Transporters – massing at nearby bases between late October and mid-November before the November 17 attack. At El Obeid air base, four Russian Mi-24 helicopters, three Nanchang Q-5 bombers, two Mig-29 fighter-bombers, two Antonov aircraft, one Mi-17 transport helicopter, and one Shaanxi Y-8 transport are seen organising before images show evidence of aerial bombardment around the town.

Abu Zabad is situated along a rail supply line and has been the site of recent conflict between the rebels and army, causing widespread civilian suffering.

The images were collected by the Satellite Sentinel Project, and show bases in the town of Dilling housing an array of artillery units, including howitzer cannons, Chinese type-59 130mm field guns, and tanks. The Satellite Sentinel Project monitors the human security situation in Sudan’s borderlands and is primarily funded by Not On Our Watch, a charity campaigning for action against mass atrocities.

Renewed offensive

Sudan’s Defence Minister Abdel-Rahim Mohamed Hussein announced the launch of military operations in the region on November 11. “We will not stop until we crush the rebels,” said Hussein, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for crimes allegedly committed in Darfur.

The Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North and the Justice and Equality Movement have been locked in a bloody conflict with the central Sudanese government surrounding the disputed Abyei region since 2010. Hostilities intensified after the division of Sudan and South Sudan, when the groups re-emphasised claims that the Khartoum government is highly repressive and discriminatory towards those in Sudan’s peripheral states.

The conflict also has roots in the 2003 Darfur war, in which an estimated 300,000 people are believed to have been killed. Khartoum has banned the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North and Justice and Equality Movement for advocating the overthrow of the current regime. The government’s campaign against rebels in Kordofan is part of President Omar al-Bashir’s promise to “eradicate rebel groups” by 2015.

In an October report the Satellite Sentinel Project, which tracks the Sudanese government’s armed forces, began to document increased military activity at state facilities in El Obeid and Kadugli, and warned there was a high risk of a renewed offensive. “The build-up of aerial assets across Sudan, particularly in El Obeid, Dilling and the surrounding environs, signals a major offensive,” the project said.

On November 17, fighters with the Sudan Revolutionary Front – a group aligned with the Justice and Equality Movement – stormed Abu Zabad. The rebel group seized positions held by Sudan’s security forces and held them for several hours.

During the latest push the Sudanese Armed Forces have mobilised almost 5,000 troops and 365 vehicles, including armoured vehicles, a spokesperson from the Satellite Sentinel Project told Al Jazeera. The organisation now says more large-scale attacks may be looming.

“When we’ve seen this kind of rhetoric and these movements in the past, it was right before major atrocities and war crimes which were basically indiscriminate towards civilians and rebels,” said Akshaya Kumar, Sudan lead at the Enough Project, an anti-genocide campaigning group that works with the Satellite Sentinel Project. “The rebels had been in Abu Zabad, but there are serious effects on civilians from this kind of disproportionate action. It’s a style of repression not congruent with the rules of war as I understand them.”

Fighting between the government and rebel groups continues. On Wednesday, army colonel Alswarmy Khalid Saad confirmed to Africa Reviewthat their troops had clashed with Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-Northforces in South Kordofan. The Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-Northhas been accused by the army of attacking Kadugli, the regional capital. Local reports claim the joint Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North rebel forces launched a counter-attack against government forces on Thursday near the Abu Zabad area.

Meanwhile, during the past year, Sudan has been building up its military capabilities – especially its air power – with contracts emerging for new helicopters and fighters. The air-power build-up is also visible in Satellite Sentinel Project reports, which show an Ilyushin Il-76 airlifter at El Obeid, a large transport aircraft previously unseen in the area.

The Sudanese air force received its first shipment of Sukhoi Su-24 ground attack aircraft at the Wadi Sayyidna air base earlier this year.

“The main advantage of the new Su-24s is that they are supersonic, so do not have to be deployed as close to the action. This means they can be based at a relatively central airfield and still be able to carry out air strikes where ever needed in southern and western Sudan,” said Jeremy Binnie, a senior analyst and Middle East/Africa editor of Jane’s Defence Weekly.

Sudan has also signed contracts for Russian Mi-24 and Mi-8 helicopters this year, according to a British defence analyst and the Russian newspaper Vedomosti.

Civilians affected

The civilian population in Abu Zabad has been blamed by the authorities for rebel activity, and have been charged by security forces with carrying out espionage for the Sudan Revolutionary Front, according to reports from Radio Dabanga.

The military campaign in the area is having serious effects on civilians, according to the Enough Project. The government officially agreed to a ceasefire in early November to allow access for a UN vaccination programme in rebel areas. But Kumar of the Enough Project said the campaign never got started.

“There’s been a total lack of commitment to allow access for the UN vaccination campaign against polio. In fact, the troop movements begin at exactly the same time as the promises that were made, so it looks like there was no intention of allowing UN access,” she said. Polio cases have been reported in neighbouring South Sudan.

Jerome Tubiana, a Sudan analyst at the International Crisis Group, told Al Jazeera there are credible reports suggesting that more than 700,000 civilians are affected by the conflict between government and rebels, including 436,000 displaced within the rebel areas.

“Government forces have fallen back on their familiar pattern of striking at communities suspected of supporting the rebels, so as to prevent the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North from living off the surrounding civilian population,” the International Crisis Group said in a report this year. “Widespread and regular bombing raids have significant impact on civilians. The most significant consequence is fear that has displaced hundreds of thousands, many to seek shelter in mountain caves.”

This article was originally published with Al Jazeera on December 2nd 2013.

Asian energy groups beat Brits in quest for Algerian renewables

British Energy companies are eyeing Algeria’s energy sector, but it’s still Middle and Far Eastern firms, not Europeans, that are closing the deals

A recent push by British companies and officials to break into Algeria’s lucrative energy industry is meeting stark competition from South Korean and Chinese business, according to corporate and diplomatic sources.

A high-level trade delegation led by the UK prime minister’s trade envoy, Lord Risby, in September saw companies such as Shell, Unicommerce, and Mott MacDonald received by the Algerian energy minister, Youcef Yousfi, to discuss furthering British-Algerian corporate relations.

Clarke Energy, a UK energy company, says it sees Algeria as a significant prospect for future business following the visit, especially in unconventional and renewable energy such as biogas.

“Our impression is that finally the renewables market in Algeria is taking off, and we’re targeting the state owned companies, Sonatrach and Sonelgaz,” says Stephane Michaut, a Clarke Energy representative who was part of the trade delegation.

“We are hoping to expand in Algeria next year in the form of power production for Sonelgaz, cogeneration, and renewable biogas. We also have plans for flare gas which we are hopeful of securing by September 2014.”

The visit was designed to be the “door-opening stage” for British access to Algeria’s energy industry, and included a visit to an Algerian solar development unit in Bou Ismail, diplomatic sources told This is Africa.

No contracts have yet been reached, but two memoranda of understanding were signed by delegates, including one arranging for Algerian engineers to gain qualifications from the UK’s Cranfield University. The visit was Lord Risby’s fourth in the last two years.

Eastern favour

International investors from the Far East are also eyeing Algeria’s renewable energy market, however, and it is in their favour that the tide appears to be turning.

Last week a similar delegation of South Korean companies visited the country, and have confirmed a major renewable energy deal. The energy division of Hanwha Corporation has established a contract with Sonelgaz worth almost $450m for the construction of a solar power plant in the province of Biskra, This is Africa has learned.

The deal underlines a growing trend in foreign investment in Algeria, which is increasingly coming from the Far East rather than Europe. China this year overtook France and Italy as the leading exporter to the country.

The Algerian government is seeking to greatly expand energy production from all sources in order to counter falling export revenues (down more than 8 percent this year) resulting from an increase in subsidised domestic demand.

Hydrocarbons are responsible for more than 95 percent of OPEC-member Algeria’s export earnings, but the amount of oil and gas available for export has fallen by more than $5bn this year, leading the government to look to private capital to finance unconventional exploration and production.

Officials have announced a target of sourcing 40 percent of the country’s electricity supply from alternative energy sources by 2030.

Middle Eastern investors are also developing ties to Algeria. The country attracted $3.1bn of foreign direct investment in the first two quarters of 2013, with the majority of the total coming from Qatar, according to the National Agency for Investment Development (ANDI).

The governments of Qatar and Algeria signed a deal in March worth at least $2bn for the construction of a steel complex at Jijel. In accordance with regulation, 5 percent is owned by Algeria’s National Investment Fund, and 49 percent split between Qatar Steel and Qatar Mining.

European investors are seeing their share of the Algerian market fall. Two European deals for construction in solar power have been cancelled this year alone.

In May the Desertec Industrial Initiative abandoned its 2011 plans to export solar power to Europe. A German consortium made up of Centrotherm Photovoltaics and Kinetics Germany then cancelled another solar project with a subsidiary of Sonelgaz known as CEEG.

Tough climate

Fierce competition between international investors for access to Algeria seems at odds with conventional wisdom on the country’s investment climate. Foreign companies have long seen Algerian energy as potentially lucrative, but have found the investment climate uncongenial.

In 2009, state regulation was enacted which was more stringent than any since the country’s oil supply was nationalised in 1971. The new rules mandated majority Algerian ownership of all foreign contracts, meaning the maximum interest foreign companies could hold in any Algerian operation was 49 percent. The World Bank’s Doing Business report ranks Algeria 152nd out of 185 internationally.

Security concerns are also serious. On January 16th 2013 a Sahel militant group known as al-Mulathameen led by renowned smuggler Mokhtar Belmokhtar attacked the Tinguentourine gas field near In Amenas taking 800 hostages. Forty oil workers, all but one foreign contractors, were killed.

In addition, corruption charges have been aimed at key industries. In July 2013, 17 executives in Algeria’s power sector, including head of Sonelgaz Noureddine Boutarfa, and his predecessor Abdelkrim Benghanem, were saddled with corruption charges relating to contracts awarded to two major internationals, the French firm Alstom and General Electric.

Analysts believe the charges may be linked to power struggles between senior officials in the Algerian intelligence service (DRS) and allies of President Abdelaziz Bouteflika, who is set to run for a fourth term in office in April’s presidential elections.

Western worries

“It’s fair to say we’re cautious on Algeria. On paper it’s a great prospect with huge gas reserves, but in reality there’s also political risk. Perhaps more importantly there’s not yet the political will to bring in the subsidies needed for renewables like biogas,” says a representative from a British Energy company looking at Algeria, who requested anonymity.

But large natural reserves, a GDP higher than any regional competitor besides Egypt, and levels of state spending on infrastructure totalling more than $250bn appear to be generating more than enough interest in Algeria.

Algerian officials have also signalled that some regulation will be loosened. The Algerian elite have vested interests in all production contracts, but while the 4 percent rule is here to stay, they have been willing to tweak the regulation in areas such as unconventional energy, analysts say.

At the end of October, the government announced the completion of a $2.3bn processing facility at El Merk designed to increase the country’s maximum production. Real growth is forecast to average 3.4 percent over the next five years.

Representatives from the trade delegation praised the British embassy’s role in organising access to Algerian officials but said problems remain in closing deals.

“On the one hand there was Sonelgaz saying they want to proceed by themselves and everything’s going to be run by the state, and on the other there’s the state regulator saying there will be feed-in tariffs and private companies will be able to sell to Sonelgaz, so it’s ambiguous,” says Clarke Energy’s Mr Michaut.

He stresses that the energy industry is highly competitive: “We’ve spent two years marketing biogas and landfill, and the need for private corporate financing. In a way we’ve been doing this job for us and our international competitors, but that’s how it has to be.”

The latest figures released by Algerian Customs confirm that in the first three quarters of 2013, the UK has risen to 10th among countries exporting to Algeria, but still trails behind France, the US, China, and even The Netherlands.

“Western companies are still a little more wary of the political and security risks in Algeria, where Middle and Far Eastern investors are more willing,” says Riccardo Fabiani, Middle East and North Africa analyst for Eurasia Group.

“Of course the traditional energy partnerships with southern Europe aren’t going anywhere, they’re reinforced by permanent pipelines, but Algeria is looking further afield for energy export revenue: to Britain, and especially to the Far East.”

This article was originally published with Financial Times: This is Africa on November 25th.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.